Breaking
News: TI is larger than St. Pete Beach???
From: George A. Makrauer [georgem@comad.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:38 AM
To: (Treasure Island Commission) Barbara Blush (E-mail);
Butch Ellsworth (E-mail); Leon Atkinson (E-mail); Mary Maloof (E-mail);
Stephanie Lavino (E-mail)
Subject: Treasure Island is SMALLER, not "larger", than St. Pete Beach
Dear
Mayor Atkinson:
Your
comments in last night's Commission
Meeting about budget and spending controls prompt this email.
You
said "Mayor
Ward" of St. Pete Beach said something along the line that he
"wished his budget could be as low as Treasure Island's, even though
his city is smaller than TI".
Immediately
then, at 5:04pm, I called St. Pete Beach City Hall and was surprised
to get a live person answering. (Try that at TI City Hall!)
It was the St. Pete Beach City Clerk. I asked her for the
land area and population of St. Pete Beach.
She
looked it up and said their land area is 2.11 sq. miles and their
population is 9,929 residents.
Mayor
Friszolowski was being politically kind with his comment to
you.
As
you must realize, "land area" does not create the principal demand on municipal government for services or
costs. "Number of household units" is the principal demand factor. Second is the "city's
population".
Treasure Island's population of approximately 7,500 is 25% smaller in people and
households (assuming similar household demographics in both cities) than St. Pete Beach, so it's completely consistent and
no surprise that the LARGER City of St. Pete Beach has a HIGHER
budget than TI. Ward's no dummy. He knows that.
Question: how does TI calculate its 3.8 sq. miles
of land? Does that calculation include the entire Causeway
to Park Street (since we're told TI owns it entirely in fee
simple), and does it include the area of Elnor Island?
In
any case, land area per se is meaningless when managing a city budget.
Households and population matter.
On
another matter, it was remarkable to hear the City Manager say he has made no preparations or planning for dealing with the financial
consequences that are hitting the State of Florida and all its cities
as a result of September 11's attack and war. Well run organizations
in government and the private sector are all planning for the potential
negative fallout that is highly likely to come. Projections
of a $1.5-billion shortfall in our State's budget alone ought to
be enough to prompt all Florida cities to take a serious look at
what they're doing and what they might have to do... to cut costs,
not raise taxes or fees.
Very
truly yours,
George
Makrauer
Isle
of Capri |